<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProcurementAlert.com &#187; Visidot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procurementalert.com/tag/visidot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procurementalert.com</link>
	<description>Strong partnerships forge strong companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Better than bar-coding, but not RFID</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/better-than-bar-coding-but-not-rfid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/better-than-bar-coding-but-not-rfid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securing transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bar code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RFID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visidot]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What would happen if you crossed an RFID system with a traditional bar-coding set-up? It probably would look and act a lot like a Visidot system. The Visidot, essentially, is the development in bar-code readers. But those developments seem to bring it closer to capabilities and functions of RFID technology. While Visidot&#8217;s primary image identification [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would happen if you crossed an RFID system with a traditional bar-coding set-up? <span id="more-196"></span>It probably would look and act a lot like a Visidot system.</p>
<p>The Visidot, essentially, is the development in bar-code readers. But those developments seem to bring it closer to capabilities and functions of RFID technology. While Visidot&#8217;s primary image identification system involves color-based symbols, it&#8217;s also equipped to read 2D bar codes.</p>
<p>But it also offers more functionality than standard bar-code systems.</p>
<p>For instance:</p>
<p>Go for the long one &#8212; Visidot has much broader and longer scanning range, up to 150 meters (about 450 feet).</p>
<p>Any which way is up &#8212; traditional bar-code scanners can only read bar codes if they&#8217;re accessibly oriented.</p>
<p>Done in a flash &#8212; Visidot proponents say a full pallet of bar-coded cases can be read in one flash, which takes about a second.</p>
<p>While the Visidot still requires a line of sight &#8212; giving RFID one advantage &#8212; the new system can read multiple bar codes at a time.</p>
<p>Example: A pallet of goods with unique serial numbers is assembled. A sheet listing those serial numbers is printed and attached to the pallet. When a Visidot reader passes over this pallet, all of the serial numbers are captured for accuracy comparison.</p>
<p>One more advantage over traditoinal bar-code reading: If there&#8217;s a damaged bar code, the Visidot reader will detect it and inform the system operator.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/better-than-bar-coding-but-not-rfid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

