<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProcurementAlert.com &#187; truck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procurementalert.com/tag/truck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procurementalert.com</link>
	<description>Strong partnerships forge strong companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are you sure you&#8217;re fully loaded?</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/are-you-sure-youre-fully-loaded/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/are-you-sure-youre-fully-loaded/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capacity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[load]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a common observation: &#8220;Our trucks are full.&#8221; But don&#8217;t be fooled &#8212; 96% of haulers are running at least 5% under weight. It&#8217;s an even more significant waste of money when you consider that most trucks tote goods at a fixed price, meaning that wasted space is wasted money. One of the biggest roadblocks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a common observation: &#8220;Our trucks are full.&#8221; But don&#8217;t be fooled &#8212; 96% of haulers are running at least 5% under weight. <span id="more-212"></span></p>
<p>It&#8217;s an even more significant waste of money when you consider that most trucks tote goods at a fixed price, meaning that wasted space is wasted money.</p>
<p>One of the biggest roadblocks to filling trucks to the brim is inefficiency in assessing just how much of a load the vehicle can bear. Then, shippers need to examine factors like number of pallets, load configuration and even stack-ability.</p>
<p>Three steps that&#8217;ll help you address this problem:</p>
<ul>
<li>Just how much of a load can you put on that truck? The limit in 48 states is 80,000 pounds. Weigh your truck (empty) and determine the difference. This&#8217;ll give you a better estimate of the load weight you can carry.</li>
<li>How accurate is your paperwork? Let&#8217;s say the bill-of-materials says the load should check in<br />
at 40,000, but the scale reads 38,000 pounds. Something&#8217;s wrong here. Determine what, and fix it.</li>
<li>What&#8217;s the capacity of your trucks &#8212; and how close are you to it? One shipping company discovered one vehicle should carry an additonal 4,000 per load. The company made adjustments, and eliminated 10% of trips and saved $1,000 per week.</li>
</ul>
<p>(The data was gleaned in June by surveying more than 860,000 trucks at weigh-in motion scales across the USA.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/are-you-sure-youre-fully-loaded/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

