<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProcurementAlert.com &#187; quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procurementalert.com/tag/quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procurementalert.com</link>
	<description>Strong partnerships forge strong companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>3 ways to better manage your suppliers</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/3-ways-to-better-manage-your-suppliers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/3-ways-to-better-manage-your-suppliers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Procurement costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchasing decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securing transactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppliers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=1238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Do you manage your suppliers, or do they manage you? 
The best way you can stay in the driver&#8217;s seat is to make sure you have an organized plan of attack for working with suppliers, one that lays out your expectations and  emphasizes quality.
There are three areas to focus on that&#8217;ll help upgrade your relationships [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-74" title="moving-cash" src="http://www.procurementalert.com/wp-content/uploads/moving-cash.jpg" alt="moving-cash" width="360" height="340" /><br />
Do you manage your suppliers, or do they manage you? <span id="more-1238"></span></p>
<p>The best way you can stay in the driver&#8217;s seat is to make sure you have an organized plan of attack for working with suppliers, one that lays out your expectations and  emphasizes quality.</p>
<p>There are three areas to focus on that&#8217;ll help upgrade your relationships with suppliers:</p>
<p><strong>1</strong>. Most companies treat poor supplier quality as collateral damage, part of the price of doing business. Here&#8217;s a painful stat: The cost of poor supplier quality (COPQ) take take a 10% bite out of an organization&#8217;s revenue.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s more than just faulty materials or goods. There&#8217;s a ripple effect &#8212; rework, slowed production, extra freight costs, warranty expenses when customers complain, and recall expenses when you have to ship it back from those customers.</p>
<p>So the first step &#8212; which many businesses don&#8217;t do now &#8212; is to track supplier quality, by logging to the bad (and the good), and what it ends up costing your company.</p>
<p><strong>2</strong>. Once you&#8217;ve done your homework, you can approach suppliers about recovering the cost of poor quality supplies. In this case, many companies charge back the goods to the supplier. When enough product starts flowing backward, suppliers will take notice.</p>
<p>Experts point out that the bulk of costs stemming from suppliers providing poor goods is NOT the materials. It&#8217;s that collateral damage that really rings up the dollars. Finding a way to quantifying these costs will show suppliers just how deep &#8212; and costly &#8212; the problem is.</p>
<p><strong>3.</strong> Finally, the best way to formalize your approach to solving these problems is to design your own supplier scorecard. Not only will you create a running evaluation of each supplier, it&#8217;ll also provide a solid framework of your expectations for these suppliers.</p>
<p>It strengthens your hand considerably when you sit down at the table with a supplier if you have a written list of problems and the costs incurred, along with a clear explanation of your expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/3-ways-to-better-manage-your-suppliers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delivery is key &#8212; but quality counts, too</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/delivery-is-key-but-quality-counts-too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/delivery-is-key-but-quality-counts-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchasing decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scorecards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supplier]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s one thing to get what your company needs in the door when your company has to have it. Your life would be easier if that&#8217;s all you had to worry about. But you know all too well that isn&#8217;t enough.
To get the job done right, you know it takes more than getting the goods delivered.
What [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s one thing to get what your company needs in the door when your company has to have it. <span id="more-172"></span>Your life would be easier if that&#8217;s all you had to worry about. But you know all too well that isn&#8217;t enough.</p>
<p>To get the job done right, you know it takes more than getting the goods delivered.</p>
<p>What good does it do you to get everything in time &#8212; if the quality of the goods is subpar, or even worse?</p>
<p>An industry services provider recently asked a cross-section of customers about the most serious supplier quality challenges facing manufacturers.</p>
<p>The top five concerns:</p>
<ol>
<li>The need for performance-based scorecards, and the managerial reluctance to adopt and implement them.</li>
<li>The lack of systems that would accommodate and encourage more efficient and centralized reporting of quality issues.</li>
<li>The failure of top-level managers to get involved or take more of an active role in supply quality management.</li>
<li>The ongoing disagreements between supply quality management and supply chain management.</li>
<li>The failure to develop risk-based analysis for assessing supplier quality.</li>
</ol>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/delivery-is-key-but-quality-counts-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
