<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProcurementAlert.com &#187; POI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procurementalert.com/tag/poi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procurementalert.com</link>
	<description>Strong partnerships forge strong companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Your supply chain doesn&#8217;t have to be perfect &#8212; here&#8217;s why</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/your-supply-chain-doesnt-have-to-be-perfect-heres-why/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/your-supply-chain-doesnt-have-to-be-perfect-heres-why/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on-time and in-full]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perfect Order Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain operation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=1536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Does your supply chain operation really need to be perfect to run at top efficiency? 
Good news: Perfection isn&#8217;t necessarily a requirement for top-level competency and success.
First of all, &#8220;perfect&#8221; is a virtually impossible standard. Even one mistake &#8212; regardless of how many orders or units are handled &#8212; immediately puts perfection beyond reach.
How much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-12" title="Proving Your Value to Your Customers" src="http://procurementalert.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/proving-value.jpg" alt="Proving Your Value to Your Customers" width="360" height="200" /><br />
Does your supply chain operation<em> really</em> need to be perfect to run at top efficiency? <span id="more-1536"></span></p>
<p>Good news: Perfection isn&#8217;t necessarily a requirement for top-level competency and success.</p>
<p>First of all, &#8220;perfect&#8221; is a virtually impossible standard. Even one mistake &#8212; regardless of how many orders or units are handled &#8212; immediately puts perfection beyond reach.</p>
<p>How much help does that provide for you as an effective benchmark of performance?</p>
<p>One reason the goal of perfection persists is because research from several years ago that said boosting perfect order fulfillment by 3% paid off with a 1% hike in profit margins.</p>
<p>But in subsequent years, a more well-rounded definition of what constitutes perfection has evolved among supply chain operators.</p>
<p>One metric that&#8217;s picked up some steam is the &#8220;Perfect Order Index.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perfect Order Index is compiled by multiplying:</p>
<ul>
<li>the percent of orders that were on-time</li>
<li>by the number of orders that were complete</li>
<li>by the percent documented correctly.</li>
</ul>
<p>Beware: POI stats can be pretty brutal at first blush. Even solid supply chain operations are likely to see numbers below 50%.</p>
<p>One critical aspect of benchmarking supply chain performance is setting the parameters.</p>
<p>What constitutes success? Is it when a shipment leaves your docks on time? Or is it if that shipment arrives at the customer&#8217;s facility when it&#8217;s supposed to?</p>
<p>Many factors &#8212; some out of your hands &#8212; can control &#8220;on-time&#8221; performance. For instance, what if the shipment leaves your facility on time, but the independent carrier has problems?</p>
<p>Your best bet is to take it back to basics, at least when starting to devise your method of measuring supply chain performance.</p>
<p>The four basic criteria supply chain benchmarking universally encompass:</p>
<ul>
<li>on-time</li>
<li>complete</li>
<li>damage-free</li>
<li>correctly &#8220;documented&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p>Another benchmark that&#8217;s been successful for many businesses is calculating &#8220;on-time, in-full&#8221; performance.</p>
<p>It is what it sounds like: How many of your orders were on-time, (either leaving your building or arriving at your customer&#8217;s facility). Then, how many of those orders were in-full &#8212; complete shipment, no damages, no rejects.</p>
<p>Heads up: You&#8217;ll need a pile of documents to accurately calculate this:</p>
<ul>
<li>invoices</li>
<li>shipping manifests</li>
<li>bar coding system</li>
<li>how cartons are labeled</li>
<li>RFID tagging, and</li>
<li>even advance shipping paperwork.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/your-supply-chain-doesnt-have-to-be-perfect-heres-why/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
