<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProcurementAlert.com &#187; performance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procurementalert.com/tag/performance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procurementalert.com</link>
	<description>Strong partnerships forge strong companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>IT will shape the future of supply chain planning: 3 ways</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/it-will-shape-the-future-of-supply-chain-planning-3-ways/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/it-will-shape-the-future-of-supply-chain-planning-3-ways/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:57:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=1570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The path of supply chain progress is never easy, but the drive to improve never ends. One problem: Many of the road signs along the way are now obscured, or difficult to understand. That&#8217;s why now is a great time to take a step back and assess where you are and where you&#8217;re going. The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The path of supply chain progress is never easy, but the drive to improve never ends. <span id="more-1570"></span></p>
<p>One problem: Many of the road signs along the way are now obscured, or difficult to understand.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why now is a great time to take a step back and assess where you are and where you&#8217;re going.</p>
<p>The biggest influence to take into account: the role of IT in improving your supply chain performance.</p>
<p>But instead of IT spending, expect pressure to &#8220;make do and mend,&#8221; experts caution. You&#8217;ll be called upon to make the best use of what&#8217;s already in place. This means there&#8217;ll be little discretionary funding available, but you&#8217;ll still need to find some money (perhaps under the couch cushions!).</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll still be expected to squeeze a few pennies out of procurement, logistics and distribution functions.</p>
<p>One idea: You might switch over to a pay-per-use technology license, rather than an annual contract.</p>
<p>Three areas experts have targeted as ripe for change:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Supply chain flow management</strong>. In response to pressure to improve lead-time indicators and supplier flexibility, you&#8217;ll be expected to work with tech vendors that offer detailed analysis and higher visibility of business functions.</li>
<li><strong>More efficient inventory management</strong>. More supply chain operators will be asking vendors to integrate their tools as part of operations, and might even begin purchasing software services from vendors.</li>
<li><strong>Production and distribution management</strong>. Supply chains will need to ramp up contingencies for a growing number of &#8220;what-if&#8221; scenarios, to be even better prepared to react quickly when conditions change.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/it-will-shape-the-future-of-supply-chain-planning-3-ways/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Bart Simpson working for you?</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/is-bart-simpson-working-for-you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/is-bart-simpson-working-for-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchasing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of Bart Simpson&#8217;s claims to fame is: &#8220;Underachiever &#8212; and proud of it.&#8221; Most employees, though, aren&#8217;t nearly so honest &#8211; and there&#8217;s a good likelihood you could occasionally encounter one or two of them in your Purchasing/Procurement department. Underachieving employees are a black hole for most companies. Research shows that only 14% of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of Bart Simpson&#8217;s claims to fame is: &#8220;Underachiever &#8212; and proud of it.&#8221; Most employees, though, aren&#8217;t nearly so honest <span id="more-113"></span>&#8211; and there&#8217;s a good likelihood you could occasionally encounter one or two of them in your Purchasing/Procurement department.</p>
<p>Underachieving employees are a black hole for most companies. Research shows that only 14% of senior execs feel their companies do a good job with these workers. In many cases, it&#8217;s tolerated, or more likely, becomes &#8220;someone else&#8217;s problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t have to be this way.</p>
<p>The first step to getting rid of the &#8220;under&#8221; is to realize you&#8217;re dealing with a people problem, not a business problem.</p>
<p>Then, there are five steps you can run through as part of your rescue project:</p>
<p>1. Take charge. This is a problem for the employee&#8217;s supervisor &#8212; not for HR. You have the best knowledge of the situation.</p>
<p>2. No beating around the bush. Address the problem directly with employees &#8212; no sugar coating. Their work isn&#8217;t up to par, and it must improve.</p>
<p>3. Are we on the same wavelength? There are cases where staffers aren&#8217;t clear on their job duties and objectives. No wonder they&#8217;re underachievers. You can set them straight.</p>
<p>4. Are they equipped to do the job? Sometimes it&#8217;s a matter of proper training or even having the right tools to complete the job successfully &#8212; and underachievers can be afraid to speak up or ask.</p>
<p>5. Deliver progress reports. More frequent feedback can help employees improve performance. Don&#8217;t wait for annual performance reviews to announce there&#8217;s a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/is-bart-simpson-working-for-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

