<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProcurementAlert.com &#187; fuel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procurementalert.com/tag/fuel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procurementalert.com</link>
	<description>Strong partnerships forge strong companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Survey: How the best firms combat fuel costs</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/survey-how-the-best-firms-combat-fuel-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/survey-how-the-best-firms-combat-fuel-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Procurement costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchasing decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation management system]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feel like you&#8217;re drowning in higher fuel costs? You&#8217;re not alone &#8212; there are plenty of procurement pros floundering alongside you. That&#8217;s the conclusion reached by an annual survey of warehouse and distribution center operations. The No. 1 problem? The survey concluded that it was impossible to talk about anything in logistics without putting fuel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.procurementalert.com/wp-content/uploads/procurement_chart1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-435" title="coping-with-fuel-costs" src="http://www.procurementalert.com/wp-content/uploads/procurement_chart1.jpg" alt="" width="396" height="392" /></a></p>
<p>Feel like you&#8217;re drowning in higher fuel costs? You&#8217;re not alone &#8212; there are plenty of procurement pros floundering alongside you. <span id="more-448"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the conclusion reached by an annual survey of warehouse and distribution center operations.</p>
<p>The No. 1 problem? The survey concluded that it was impossible to talk about anything in logistics without putting fuel costs front and center.</p>
<p>Despite lower costs, fuel prices have had a greater influence on procurement operations than any other single factor.</p>
<p>The biggest area of concern has been smaller and less-than-truckload (LTL) shipments. One out of three businesses have re-routed company trucks and consulted transportation management system (TMS) software in an effort to consolidate shipments and make sure routes are as short as possible.</p>
<p>The next most-utilized, fuel-saving strategy has been to work with larger customers to decrease the frequency of orders, while increasing the size of orders.</p>
<p>Adding to this problem: Lower customer demands have driven down inventory turns, which throws a monkey wrench into the machinery and drives up warehouse bills.</p>
<p>Last year, warehouses were averaging 9.8 turns per year. Now, that figure&#8217;s to 8.7 a year &#8212; an 11% plunge.</p>
<p>This has made life even more complicated for forecasters, who often work weeks if not months in advance.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the best strategy for survival?</p>
<p>Good news: According to the 3rd Annual Warehouse/DC Operations survey, run by <em>Logistics Management</em>magazine, it&#8217;s maintaining status quo.</p>
<p>While a few supply chains are tweaking technology to save a step here and there, most are hunkering down and finding ways to improve efficiency with the tools and personnel already on hand.</p>
<p>That works two ways:</p>
<ul>
<li>First, you still call the shots and remain in charge of what&#8217;s going on with your supply chain operation, and</li>
<li>Second, any improvements you make will go straight to strengthen the bottom line, since costs will be minimal.</li>
</ul>
<p>In other words, this could be an opportunity to not only rise to the challenge, but to excel in the spotlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/survey-how-the-best-firms-combat-fuel-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disruptions dinged 99% of supply chains</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/disruptions-dinged-99-of-supply-chains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/disruptions-dinged-99-of-supply-chains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchasing decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppliers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did your supply chain hit a rough patch of road last year? You&#8217;re not alone. In fact, 99% of companies responding to a recent Aberdeen Group survey encountered supply chain disruptions, and more than half took a hit in the wallet as a result. The supply chain disruptions reported most commonly: supplier capacity fell short [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did your supply chain hit a rough patch of road last year? You&#8217;re not alone. <span id="more-170"></span>In fact, 99% of companies responding to a recent Aberdeen Group survey encountered supply chain disruptions, and more than half took a hit in the wallet as a result.</p>
<p>The supply chain disruptions reported most commonly:</p>
<ul>
<li>supplier capacity fell short of demand (56%)</li>
<li>shortages or price increases for raw materials (49%)</li>
<li>unanticipated customer demand changes (45%)</li>
<li>shipments that were delayed, damaged or misdirected (39%), and</li>
<li>shortages or price hikes for fuel (35%)</li>
</ul>
<p>The key to staying ahead of these disruptions is to develop a risk management plan, experts say &#8212; essentially anticipating what problems could occur and having an action plan or a back-up supplier.</p>
<p>Problem: Not even one-third of supply chain operations are working to manage the basic risks.</p>
<p>The other critical factor: Organization and communication within your own company. The decision makers need to know of all possible risks before making a move &#8212; something that doesn&#8217;t happen enough, experts say.</p>
<p>Also, your internal processes need to be well-organized enough that there&#8217;s visibility into all critical stages of the operation &#8212; warehouse, transportation, working with supply chain partners.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/disruptions-dinged-99-of-supply-chains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

