<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProcurementAlert.com &#187; deliveries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procurementalert.com/tag/deliveries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procurementalert.com</link>
	<description>Strong partnerships forge strong companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supply chain reaction: What&#8217;s ahead in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/supply-chain-reaction-whats-ahead-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/supply-chain-reaction-whats-ahead-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliveries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pallets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=1127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supply chain operations took it on the chain in 2008, between transportation costs, shifting customer needs and unsteady suppliers. But it&#8217;s not all bad news for 2009: By shining a light on these problems, they catapult to the front burner for many companies. If there was one theme to tackling these problems, it would better [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Supply chain operations took it on the chain in 2008, between transportation costs, shifting customer needs and unsteady suppliers. <span id="more-1127"></span></p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not all bad news for 2009: By shining a light on these problems, they catapult to the front burner for many companies.</p>
<p>If there was one theme to tackling these problems, it would better cooperation between the players involved.</p>
<p>A recent study showed that only 11% of companies said their supply chain planning and operations were highly integrated with the rest of company functions.</p>
<p>But the same study also points out that 92% of the same companies are planning to implement better planning and execution of supply chain strategies over the next three years.</p>
<p>Three strategies are cited in bringing that about:</p>
<ul>
<li>better supply chain visibility</li>
<li>linking existing supply chain software systems with internal and external customers, and</li>
<li>improving collaboration with suppliers and customers.</li>
</ul>
<p>The other area of focus in improving supply chain operations is transportation.</p>
<p>There are three main aspects to transportation that supply chain operators hope that implementing will lead to better integration with all customers &#8212; inside and outside of the company.</p>
<ul>
<li>Squeezing more pallets, cartons or product onto every truck leaving the docks. This can be achieved with optimization technology or good old elbow grease and common sense.</li>
<li>Dock door scheduling systems, which puts the function in the hands of the people who have most at stake. Better scheduling of supplier deliveries is a win-win.</li>
<li>Trying new transportation strategies, like switching from truck freight to intermodal transportation. Another strategy: setting up a consolidation center for shipping when distance is involved, rather than have all shipment originate from home base.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/supply-chain-reaction-whats-ahead-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trimming around the edges without compromising quality</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/trimming-around-the-edges-without-compromising-quality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/trimming-around-the-edges-without-compromising-quality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchasing decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliveries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppliers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goal-setting is usually is a key element of sound business practices. So it figures that much of what you do is about aiming for and fulfilling goals, from your budget to on-time deliveries to customer satisfaction. But beware: Shooting for goals at face value can sometimes blow up in your face, especially if the goal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goal-setting is usually is a key element of sound business practices. So it figures that much of what you do is about aiming for and fulfilling goals, from your budget to on-time deliveries to customer satisfaction. <span id="more-945"></span></p>
<p>But beware: Shooting for goals at face value can sometimes blow up in your face, especially if the goal is trimming money from the purchasing and procurement budget.</p>
<p>Case in point: You&#8217;re charged with reducing the purchasing budget by a specific amount, $XXX &#8212; without any loss in quality when it comes to suppliers and your purchasing performance.</p>
<p>Managers higher on the food chain often believe this is easily accomplished: Replace those expensive, old suppliers with cheaper, newer ones.</p>
<p>Uh, not this time.</p>
<p>Sure, you&#8217;re looking hard for suppliers that will out-perform your current suppliers &#8212; but they could very well end up being your <span style="text-decoration: underline;">current</span> suppliers.</p>
<p>Your criteria remain consistent:</p>
<ul>
<li>on-time deliveries</li>
<li>low rates of material defects</li>
<li>high supplier service performance</li>
<li>internal customer satisfaction, and</li>
<li>lower prices.</li>
</ul>
<p>Good news: You may not need to search far and wide.</p>
<p>Given the current economic climate, it could be an ideal time for you to negotiate with existing suppliers.</p>
<p>They might be more willing to make certain concessions, rather than lose all of your business.</p>
<p>One note of caution: Be sure you&#8217;re keeping track &#8212; metrics &#8212; against benchmarked performance, to prove in dollars and cents that you&#8217;ve saved money and improved purchasing and procurement performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/trimming-around-the-edges-without-compromising-quality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would your supply chain be ready for Ike?</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/would-your-supply-chain-be-ready-for-ike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/would-your-supply-chain-be-ready-for-ike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In this week's e-Newsletter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News & Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply chain technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deliveries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply chain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Natural disasters like Hurricanes Ike and Gustav have stretched resources and supply chain operations to the breaking point over the past few weeks. How can you possibly be prepared when a disaster is bearing down on you? At the top end of the preparedness scale, you&#8217;ll find logistics and trucking company Ryder System Inc. Ryder has an emergency [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natural disasters like Hurricanes Ike and Gustav have stretched resources and supply chain operations to the breaking point <span id="more-179"></span>over the past few weeks. How can you possibly be prepared when a disaster is bearing down on you?</p>
<p>At the top end of the preparedness scale, you&#8217;ll find logistics and trucking company Ryder System Inc.</p>
<p>Ryder has an emergency communications systems that tracks employees and keep them up to date. The system collects contact information on individuals.</p>
<p>When it comes to planning your own disaster-reaction plan, experts advise, assume the worst. That way, you&#8217;ll be ready to adapt to the worst-case scenario, should it occur.</p>
<p>One of the most universal and likely hardships you can expect is loss of electrical power. Determine now how your company handle this: Wait for power to be restored? Use generators for core operations?</p>
<p>Electricity, natural gas and most fuels are the most basic building blocks. Without power or mobility, most businesses remain shuttered until the lights go back on.</p>
<p>A quick recounting of the impact of Ike on logistics illustrates a few of the other impacts you might want to consider in your planning:</p>
<ul>
<li>Most area trucking companies held shipments and closed plants</li>
<li>Pickups and deliveries were suspended in five Texas cities including Houston, and cargo was held in Dallas</li>
<li>Expected recovery time from suspended services: Usually two or three days to catch up with deliveries, and</li>
<li>Railroad shipments were delayed by about two to three days.</li>
</ul>
<p>Port closings for a few days didn&#8217;t have a big impact on deliveries since many customers had a &#8220;buffer in the system.&#8221;</p>
<p>Still, other customers waiting for specific deliveries saw disruptions.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/would-your-supply-chain-be-ready-for-ike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

