<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ProcurementAlert.com &#187; cost-savings goals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procurementalert.com/tag/cost-savings-goals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procurementalert.com</link>
	<description>Strong partnerships forge strong companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:19:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Paychecks getting fatter for Purchasing pros</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/paychecks-getting-fatter-for-purchasing-pros/</link>
		<comments>http://www.procurementalert.com/paychecks-getting-fatter-for-purchasing-pros/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 14:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Walker</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Procurement costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Procurement trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Purchasing decisions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost-savings goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purchasing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suppliers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good news: In these days of financial austerity and vanishing jobs, Purchasing pros are more valuable to their companies than ever. Many employers are recognizing this where it counts most &#8212; in your paycheck. The annual salary survey from the highly-respected Purchasing.com people shows that total compensation packages (salary plus bonus) for purchasing professionals increased [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.procurementalert.com/wp-content/uploads/bonuseschart.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-539" title="bonuseschart" src="http://www.procurementalert.com/wp-content/uploads/bonuseschart.jpg" alt="" width="333" height="368" /></a></p>
<p>Good news: In these days of financial austerity and vanishing jobs, Purchasing pros are more valuable to their companies than ever. Many employers are recognizing this where it counts most &#8212; in your paycheck. <span id="more-529"></span></p>
<p>The annual salary survey from the highly-respected Purchasing.com people shows that total compensation packages (salary plus bonus) for purchasing professionals increased a healthy 4% in 2008.</p>
<p>More good news: The prospects remain good for 2009.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s driving this train?</p>
<p>Purchasing has moved up the food chain, in terms of its visibility and the resources it garners.</p>
<ul>
<li>One reason: Companies are taking a hard look at low-cost sourcing strategies.</li>
<li>Another reason: Purchasing pros are expected to bring tougher negotiation skills to the table, when dealing with suppliers.</li>
<li>Finally, management recognizes Purchasing staffers with bonuses for hitting cost-savings goals (below target, on target, above target)</li>
</ul>
<p>While salaries remain important, bonuses are the bread and butter.</p>
<p>Nearly two-thirds of Purchasing pros received fatter checks due to bonus payments &#8212; that averaged 14% of their annual salaries.</p>
<p>Further breakdowns:</p>
<ul>
<li>Overall average salary, $88,206</li>
<li>Average salary for men, $95,427; for women, $71,951</li>
<li>C.P.M. certified staffers, $99,539; C.P.I.M. staffers, $96,361</li>
<li>Average salary by company size: under $125M was $68,422; $126M &#8211; $500M was $89,528; over $500M was $106,660.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.procurementalert.com/paychecks-getting-fatter-for-purchasing-pros/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

