<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better than bar-coding, but not RFID</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.procurementalert.com/better-than-bar-coding-but-not-rfid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/better-than-bar-coding-but-not-rfid/</link>
	<description>Strong partnerships forge strong companies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 22:15:59 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Latest from the Inventory Desk&#8230; &#124; ProcurementAlert.com &#124; Strong partnerships forge strong companies</title>
		<link>http://www.procurementalert.com/better-than-bar-coding-but-not-rfid/comment-page-1/#comment-1188</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest from the Inventory Desk&#8230; &#124; ProcurementAlert.com &#124; Strong partnerships forge strong companies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.procurementalert.com/?p=196#comment-1188</guid>
		<description>[...] Better than bar-coding, but not RFID [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Better than bar-coding, but not RFID [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
